Chicago
“Bibliography.” In
From Question to Publication: A Research Handbook for Life
Sciences Graduate Students: A Library Perspective on the Full
Research Cycle. Online: Open Education Resources, 2026.
https://endearing-llama-b2db36.netlify.app/bibliography/.
MLA
“Bibliography.”
From Question to Publication: A Research Handbook for Life
Sciences Graduate Students: A Library Perspective on the Full
Research Cycle, by Claude Claude, Open Education Resources, 2026,
https://endearing-llama-b2db36.netlify.app/bibliography/.
Accessed
DD Mon. YYYY.
Day, R. A., & Gastel, B. (2012).
How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (7th
ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.
Gopen, G. D., & Swan, J. A. (1990). The science of
scientific writing. American Scientist, 78(6),
550–558.
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., &
Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for
research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431.
https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M.,
Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019).
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of
Interventions
(2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s
scientific research output.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
102(46), 16569–16572.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
(2023).
Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing,
and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical
Journals.
http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
Lauer, M. S., & Krumholz, H. M. (2017). Strengths and
weaknesses of the NIH peer review process.
JAMA Cardiology, 2(12), 1388–1390.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3737
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der
Heyden, L., & Gisle, L. (2017). Work organization and
mental health problems in PhD students.
Research Policy, 46(4), 868–879.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
McKiernan, E. C., Bourne, P. E., Brown, C. T., Buck, S.,
Kenall, A., Lin, J., … & Yarkoni, T. (2016). How open
science helps researchers succeed. eLife, 5,
e16800.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
(2018).
Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
https://doi.org/10.17226/25038
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
(2019).
Reproducibility and Replicability in Science.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
https://doi.org/10.17226/25303
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., &
Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
115(11), 2600–2606.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the
reproducibility of psychological science.
Science, 349(6251), aac4716.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007).
Sharing detailed research data is associated with
increased citation rate. PLOS ONE, 2(3), e308.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000308
Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P.,
Matthias, L., Norlander, B., … & Haustein, S. (2018).
The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence
and impact of open access articles. PeerJ, 6,
e4375.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U.,
Wu, L., Read, E., … & Frame, M. (2011). Data sharing
by scientists: Practices and perceptions.
PLOS ONE, 6(6), e21101.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J.,
Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., … & Mons, B.
(2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data
management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3,
160018.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18